Bhagirath Singh vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Bhagirath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. case disposed with directions. (Para 1 , 7)
2. petitioner seeks financial upgradation benefits. (Para 2 , 5)
3. acceptance of notice and lack of stays. (Para 3 , 4)
4. direction for consideration of the claim. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking a number of prayers. However, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that a similar order as passed by a Division Bench in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 dated 30th May, 2019 be passed in the present writ petition. He clarifies that neither the judgment and order dated 30th May, 2019 in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 nor the judgments referred to in the said order have been challenged before the Supreme Court by the respondents.

3. Issue notice.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in similar matters notices have been issued by the Supreme Court in the application for condonation of delay and Special Leave Petitions. He, however, candidly states that there is no stay in the said Special Leave Petitions.

5. It is pertinent to mention that the petitioner has preferred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document