SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
HDFC Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Delhi Value Added Tax Department of Trade and Taxes – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks interim relief for issuing 'f' forms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of pending demands affect issuance of 'f' forms. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11)
3. court's analysis of compliance and jurisdiction over tax demands. (Para 10 , 12 , 16)
4. rule 5(4) allows withholding of 'f' forms for unpaid tax. (Para 14 , 15)
5. application for interim relief denied; case dismissed. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J.

CM APPL. No.18276/2021

1. This application has been filed by the petitioner praying for the following relief:

    "Allow the present application and grant an interim relief to the Petitioner by directing the Respondent No. 2 to issue the requisite `F' Forms to the Petitioner in respect of the interstate stock transfers undertaken by the Petitioner during the period starting from April 2016 until June 2017."

2. It is the case of the petitioner that as a part of its business operation, from April 2016 until June 2017, the petitioner moved "Bullion" stored in its branches located in the other states of India to its branch located in Delhi, to maintain a single reserve of "Bullion" instead of storing the same in a scattered manner in different branches. The pe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top