SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Otis Elevator Company (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Value Added Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks writ for online form 'f' (Para 1 , 2)
2. reassessments for fy 2007-08 and 2008-09 barred (Para 3)
3. petitioner asserts tax demands resolved (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. arguments on blocking form 'f' discussed (Para 8 , 9)
5. court observes lack of notice and hearing (Para 10 , 11)
6. rule regarding issuance of form 'f' clarified (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. commissioner failed to comply with prerequisites (Para 15)
8. petition allowed with directives (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)

CM 33409/2021

This is an application seeking early hearing of the petition.

For the reasons stated in the application and with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the application is allowed and the petition is taken up for final hearing today itself.

W.P.(C) 5626/2019

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to enable the issuance of Form `F' by unblocking the online Form `F' facility of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner further prays for a declaration that the reassessments for the Financial Year (hereinafter referred to as `FY') 2007-08 and 2008-09 are barred by limitation under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top