Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Love Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Kathuria – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenging order regarding written statement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. commercial court's dismissal on delay grounds. (Para 5) |
| 3. contention regarding delays due to covid-19. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. supreme court's interpretation of limitation in cpc. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. impact of petitioner's delays on case outcomes. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 6. court's views on delay in filing petitions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. dismissal of petition without grounds for interference. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)
CM 37774/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
CM(M) 848/2021 & CM 37773/2021 (for stay)
3. The present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 23rd March, 2021 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court-02, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in suit bearing CS (COMM.) No.185/2020, whereby the application filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant under Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for grant of extension of time and condonation of delay in filing written statement has been dismissed.
4. The facts leading to the filing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
