SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Centre for Development of Telematics – Appellant
Versus
Xalted Information Systems Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. need for substitute arbitrator due to original arbitrator's death. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arbitral fees and requests for a qualified substitute arbitrator. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. appointment and terms of the new arbitrator. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. disposal of the petition and miscellaneous application. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER (Oral)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 103/2021 & I.A. 13223/2021

1. The disputes between the parties were being arbitrated by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar, a learned retired Judge of this Court, who, unfortunately, expired during the currency of the Covid 2019 pandemic.

2. As such, the present has been moved for appointment of a substitute arbitrator to complete the proceedings.

3. Arbitral fees were required, as per the order dated 30th March, 2016, in appointing Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar as the Arbitrator, to be paid in accordance with the Fourth Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act"). Learned counsel for the parties submit that the arguments before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar had concluded and the award was reserved when, unfortunately, he expired. As such, they submit that the arbitration is nearing it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top