Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Rajni Raheja - Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Chawla - Respondent
CS(OS) 446 of 2019 & I.A. 13737 of 2021
Decided On : 25-10-2021
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Settlement of Disputes
Headnote
(B) Decree - The suit is decreed in terms of the memorandum of settlement and the parties shall remain bound by it - The registry is directed to draw up a decree sheet accordingly. (Paras 2-3)
Facts of the case:
The parties reached a settlement through a memorandum of settlement, rendering the adjudication of the suit unnecessary.
Findings of Court:
The suit stands disposed of in accordance with the settlement made by the parties.
Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the suit should be decreed based on the settlement reached by the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that since the parties had settled their dispute, there was no need for further adjudication, and the terms of the settlement were to be binding.
Result: The suit stands disposed of as decreed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement between parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. suit decreed based on settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
ORDER (ORAL)
CS(OS) 446/2019 & I.A.13737/2021 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC)
1. The dispute between the parties stands settled vide memorandum of settlement dated 26th September, 2021, which is placed on record. Learned Counsel for the parties are present.
2. As such, nothing survives for adjudication in the present suit. The suit is accordingly decreed in terms of the memorandum of settlement dated 26th September, 2021, by which the parties shall remain bound.
3. The Registry is directed to draw up a decree sheet accordingly. The suit stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
