SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
Las Ground Force Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Airports Authority of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5386 of 2021 & CM Appl. 16649 of 2021
Decided On : 23-11-2021




The court affirmed that failure to comply with contractual obligations cannot be excused by force majeure claims where the party did not act with due diligence, emphasizing the need for adherence to stipulated timelines in contracts.

Headnote:(A) Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Section 11 - Writ Petition for Certiorari and Mandamus - Cancellation of Letter of Intent to Award for non-submission of bank guarantees within stipulated time - Petitioner claimed COVID-19 lockdown as justification for delays. Court found delays unjustified, ruled against applicability of force majeure, supporting decision with business principles dictated by Section 11. Respondent's action upheld as reasonable and within contract terms. (Paras 44-66)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of Judicial Review in Tender Matters - Court emphasized its limited role in evaluating soundness of decisions, focusing instead on legality and absence of arbitrariness - Public interest must prevail over private grievances. (Paras 62-64)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a company managing ground services, failed to submit required bank guarantees within the specified timeline under a Letter of Intent issued by the Airports Authority for ground handling services at Goa airport due to claimed delays stemming from COVID-19; despite reminders and opportunities, compliance remained incomplete.

Findings of Court:
There was no merit in the petition. The Respondents were justified in cancelling the Letter of Intent for non-compliance with contractual terms.

Issues: Whether cancellation of the Letter of Intent was justified due to failure to meet contractual obligations and whether force majeure could excuse that failure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that delays were excusable due to COVID-19, emphasizing that the petitioner had not acted with due diligence and the respondent's actions were valid under the terms of the contract.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background of petition and entities involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. procedures for performance bank guarantees. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. cancellation of loia and petitioner's grievances. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
4. respondents' counterarguments and compliance issues. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. issue of delays and justification by petitioner. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
6. administrative acts must be reasonable. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
7. force majeure applicability discussed. (Para 64 , 65)
8. conclusion: dismissal of the petition. (Para 66)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking the following substantial reliefs:

    "(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of certiorari setting aside quashing the letter dated 04.05.2021 bearing no. AAI/OPS/GHS/11/GP/2020 sent by the Respondent No. 1 (AAI) to the Petitioner No. 1 cancelling the Letter of Intent to Award dated 12.01.2021 and forfeiting the Bid Security, as arbitrary, unreasonable, mala fide and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India;

    (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus setting aside the forfeiture of the Petitioner's Bid Security, restoring the Petitioner's Bid Security and restoring the Letter of Intent to Award dated 12.01.2021 issued in favour of the Petitioner No. 1 for the Goa airport;

    (c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to accept the bank guarantees obtained by the Petitioners in favour of AAI, viz. (i) Bank Guarantee No.1394FB210095 dated 26.02.2021 issued by Axis Bank for Rs. 1,77,54,708/-, and (ii) Bank Guarantee No. 01742IGL0001421 dated 29.04.2021 issued by Union Bank of India for Rs. 3,29,73,029/-, in compliance of Para 6(i) of the LOIA;"

2. Briefly stating the facts giving rise to filing of the present writ petition are as under:

3. That the Petitioner No. 1 is a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 in Mumbai. It is engaged in handling ground services offered to airlines at Airports. The Petitioner No. 2 is also a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 in Goa and is a Joint Venture (JV) company/SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) of Petitioner No.1 and its consortium partner Goldair Handling S.A. (based in Greece) to perform contractual obligations under tenders awarded to the consortium as a Concessionaire.

4. The Respondent No.1 is the Airports Authority of India ("AAI"). It is the authority empowered to manage airports across India and to give licenses/concessions to service providers for providing ground handling services in airports across India.

5. The Respondent No.2 is the Executive Director (Operations) of Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.3 is the Airport Director at Goa airport, the person responsible for correspondence and further execution of work on behalf of the Respondent No. 1.

6. In June, 2018, the Respondent No.1 floated a tender for selecting a concessionaire to provide ground handling facilities at Goa airport and various other airports. However, the said tender was cancelled without assigning any reason and a new tender was again floated in August, 2018 for various airports, classified under different groups.

7. Subsequently, this tender was cancelled, and a new tender was floated in November, 2018. The consortium of Petitioner No.1 and Goldair Handling S.A. was selected as the successful bidder for Goa airport and some other airports. However, the said tender was also cancelled 12.06.2019.

8. On 27.01.2020, the Respondent No.1 issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose of selecting a concessionaire to provide Ground Handling Facilities and Ground Handling Services at the Goa Airport, managed by the AAI for a period of 10 years. The RFP was revised in response to the bidder queries by Corrigend








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top