SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1255

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Saptagiri Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Airport Authority Of India And Another – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Mr. Pavan Narang & Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, Advocates, for the Petitioner; Mr. Digvijay Rai, Mr. Archit Mishra, Mr. Aman Yadav, Advocates, for the Respondents No.1/AAI; Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General, Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Rishav Dubey, Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Mr. Saurabh Tirpathi, Mr. Sahag Garg, Advocates, for the Respondents UoI.; Ms. Anjana Gosain, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms. Shalini Nair, Ms. Ritika Kranjawal, Advocates. & Mr. R. M. Tripathi, Government Pleader, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. - The instant Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing/setting aside the Letter bearing Ref. No. AAI/RC/CML/M&C/F&B/544-45 dated 27.10.2021 issued by Respondent No. 1 and the decision of the competent authority terminating the tender for "Concession to Design, Fit-Out, Finance, Develop, Market, Operate, Maintain And Manage the Food & Beverage Outlets at NITB, Birsa Munda Airport Ranchi" awarded to the Petitioner vide Letter of Intent to Award (LOIA) dated 29.07.2021. The Petitioner has also prayed for a direction to Respondent No. 1 to execute the Concession Agreement in terms of the Request for Proposal (hereinafter referred to as 'the RFP') with the Petitioner and hand over the possession of the space allotted and earmarked for food and beverage outlet in terms of the Request for Proposal to the Petitioner in furtherance of Letter bearing Ref No. AAI/RC/CML/M&C/F&B/362-71 dated 29.07.2021 and for a direction to restrain the Respondent No. 1 from taking any coercive steps against the Petitioner by invoking/ en-cashing the Ban

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                    whatsapp-icon Back to top