Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Vibhuti Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and factual background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. investigation results indicate irregularities (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. charge sheet outlines prosecution's case (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. analysis of conspiracy and roles of parties (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. conclusion on sufficiency of evidence to charge (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is directed against the orders on framing of charges dated 16.12.2020 and 23.12.2020 passed in CC No. 249/2019 by Ld. Special Judge, (CBI-05), (Prevention of Corruption Act), Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi.
2. The facts, in brief, leading to the present petition are as follows:
a) Information was received that irregularities had been committed in awarding of tender pertaining to renovation work at Pay and Accounts Office (PAO), (IRLA), AGCR Building, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi.
b) On receipt of the information, a preliminary inquiry being PE-7(A)/2012-DLI was registered on 26.09.2012 at CBI, ACB, Delhi.
c) An inquiry was conducted by SI Ram Kumar Shukla, CBI, ACB, New Delhi.
d) On completion of inquiry, SI Ram Kumar Shukla registered an FIR being RC No.DAI
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
