Sanjiv Paul vs Union of India through C. B. I.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1017

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sanjiv Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through C. B. I. – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sidhartha Luthra Sr. Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate Mr. Ganesh Pathak, Advocate (Cr. Rev. 133/2020) Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates (Cr. Rev. 571/2019) Mr. Sidhartha Agarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate (Cr. Rev. 676/2019) Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate (Cr. Rev. 690/2019) Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate (Cr. Rev. 764/2019) Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha Mr. Akchansh Kishore (Cr.M.P. 2/22, 3/22, 13/22)
For the Respondent: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI Mr. Bajrang Kumar, A.C. to ASGI

JUDGMENT :

1. These Criminal Revision Petitions arise out of order passed by the Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi in RC Case no. 4 (A)/2006 (R) registered under Sections 120B read with 420 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 whereby and whereunder the discharge petition under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners/accused persons has been rejected. Since all the revision arise from the common order therefore they have been heard together and will be disposed by common order.

2. Cr. M.P. Nos. 2, 3 and 13 of 2022 were filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order of cognizance and entire proceeding. This Court vide order dated 8.7.2022 permitted these cases to be heard analogous with the present revision petitions for the reason that earlier the revision petitions filed by these petitioners against the discharge petitions were permitted to be withdrawn for being heard in these criminal miscellaneous petitions. These petitions have been also been heard together and shall be disposed of by common order.

PROSECUTION C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1017

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARYSanjiv Paul – AppellantVersusUnion of India through C. B. I. – Respondent

Cases Referred (11)

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Sanjiv Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through C. B. I. – Respondent