SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Parshant - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10885 of 2021 & C.M. No. 33573 of 2021
Decided On : 27-09-2021




Court upheld the fairness of the decision-making process in rejecting the petitioner's candidature due to non-attendance at the medical examination, emphasizing adherence to procedure.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - Judicial Review - The challenge is against the non-consideration for the post of Sailor in the Indian Navy due to non-attendance at the medical examination which was missed because of an accident - Fair and reasonable decision-making process upheld by the Court as the Petitioner was duly informed of consequences for non-attendance. (Paras 2-5)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner cleared all phases of the selection procedure but could not attend the final medical examination due to a fracture and sought postponement which was not accepted by the respondents.

Findings of Court:
The decision-making process followed by the respondents to reject the petitioner's candidature was held to be fair and reasonable.

Issues: The main question was whether the petitioner should be given another opportunity for the final medical examination.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the respondents acted within their rights according to the Call-up Letter provisions, emphasizing that the non-attendance due to personal circumstances does not compel the authority to deviate from the established procedural norms.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim is based on medical circumstances. (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's request for a second chance was denied. (Para 4)
3. court finds decision-making process fair. (Para 5)
4. writ petition is dismissed. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The appeal has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the reply dated 11th June, 2021 issued by the respondents to the petitioner's legal notice, whereby the petitioner was not considered for the post of Sailor in the Indian Navy as he did not turn up for the final enrolment medical examination. Petitioner also seeks direction to the respondents to conduct the final enrolment medical examination of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had successfully cleared the Phase I, Phase II and the medical examination of the selection procedure for the post of AA SSR. She states that the petitioner met with an accident which resulted in a fracture due to which the petitioner was unable to report for his final enrolment medical examination which was scheduled on 12th February, 2020. She states that the doctor had advised the petitioner to take complete bed rest and had opined that the petitioner would be able to walk properly only after three to five months.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents to postpone the final enrolment medical examination of the petitioner to any other date in view of the unforeseen circumstances, however, the same was not considered by the respondents and they refused to accept any explanation by the petitioner for his nonattendance. She states that the respondents were unreasonable in not giving the petitioner a second chance to appear in the final enrolment medical examination which can easily be conducted at a later date or along with any other batch.

5. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the petitioner's candidature has been rejected as the petitioner did not report on the scheduled date and time for medical examination. Para-4 of the Call-up Letter dated 17th January, 2020 specifically states that selection will stand cancelled and candidates will have no claim for enrolment in Indian Navy, in case they fail to report on the scheduled date and time. Moreover, the initial training of the successful candidates of AA/SSR-01/2020 batch, for which the petitioner had applied for, is already over and the said candidates are undergoing professional training. Consequently, this Court is of the view that the decision making process in the present case was fair and reasonable and the petitioner cannot be given a chance to re-join the batch of AA/SSR01/ 2020 or any other subsequent batch for which a separate and independent selection process would have to be undergone.

6. Accordingly, the present writ petition along with pending application is dismissed.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top