IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Parshant - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10885 of 2021 & C.M. No. 33573 of 2021
Decided On : 27-09-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim is based on medical circumstances. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's request for a second chance was denied. (Para 4) |
| 3. court finds decision-making process fair. (Para 5) |
| 4. writ petition is dismissed. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The appeal has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the reply dated 11th June, 2021 issued by the respondents to the petitioner's legal notice, whereby the petitioner was not considered for the post of Sailor in the Indian Navy as he did not turn up for the final enrolment medical examination. Petitioner also seeks direction to the respondents to conduct the final enrolment medical examination of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had successfully cleared the Phase I, Phase II and the medical examination of the selection procedure for the post of AA SSR. She states that the petitioner met with an accident which resulted in a fracture due to which the petitioner was unable to report for his final enrolment medical examination which was scheduled on 12th February, 2020. She states that the doctor had advised the petitioner to take complete bed rest and had opined that the petitioner would be able to walk properly only after three to five months.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents to postpone the final enrolment medical examination of the petitioner to any other date in view of the unforeseen circumstances, however, the same was not considered by the respondents and they refused to accept any explanation by the petitioner for his nonattendance. She states that the respondents were unreasonable in not giving the petitioner a second chance to appear in the final enrolment medical examination which can easily be conducted at a later date or along with any other batch.
5. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the petitioner's candidature has been rejected as the petitioner did not report on the scheduled date and time for medical examination. Para-4 of the Call-up Letter dated 17th January, 2020 specifically states that selection will stand cancelled and candidates will have no claim for enrolment in Indian Navy, in case they fail to report on the scheduled date and time. Moreover, the initial training of the successful candidates of AA/SSR-01/2020 batch, for which the petitioner had applied for, is already over and the said candidates are undergoing professional training. Consequently, this Court is of the view that the decision making process in the present case was fair and reasonable and the petitioner cannot be given a chance to re-join the batch of AA/SSR01/ 2020 or any other subsequent batch for which a separate and independent selection process would have to be undergone.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition along with pending application is dismissed.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
Court upheld the fairness of the decision-making process in rejecting the petitioner's candidature due to non-attendance at the medical examination, emphasizing adherence to procedure.
Timely communication and participation in recruitment processes are essential, and failure to do so can result in dismissal based on delay and laches.
Delay and laches in communicating inability to report for recruitment process can bar a petitioner from obtaining relief, especially when there is an ongoing recruitment process.
Candidates must act diligently and promptly when disputing recruitment disqualifications, as delays can negate their claims even if circumstances change subsequently.
The Court upheld military medical standards, ruling that civilian doctors' evaluations cannot contradict specialized military assessments of fitness for Armed Forces recruitment.
The opinion of the medical experts of the appointing authority shall prevail, and the parameters of fitness and required standards for appointment in the Indian Navy cannot be judicially reviewed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the medical fitness for enrollment in the Indian Navy is determined based on specific medical conditions identified by the Appeal Medical Boar....
The court emphasized that a single testicle did not automatically render the petitioner unfit for Navy service, leading to the direction for a re-examination by the Medical Board.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the opinions of the Armed Forces/Navy specialists in matters of medical fitness for recruitment, particularly in t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.