Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Vipin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
1. The petitioner was a candidate for recruitment undertaken by the respondents Indian Navy, as far back as in June, 2018, of Artificer Apprentices and Senior Secondary Recruits and cleared the phase I and phase II of the recruitment process/examination but in the medical examination held on 10th August, 2019, was declared unfit for the reason of suffering from Left Ear Tympano Sclerosis. The petitioner appealed but the Appeal Medical Board, which examined the petitioner, vide its report dated 30th August, 2019, also declared the petitioner unfit on the same ground.
2. It is the case of the petitioner, that he got himself examined and operated at Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital at Delhi on 19th September, 2019 and the disability on account of which the petitioner was declared unfit, was cured by the said surgery. It is further the case of the petitioner, that he, on 11th March, 2020 filed a petition in this Court challenging the rejection of his candidature but which petition could not be listed owing to the restricted functioning of the Court because of the prevalent pandemic and thus the petitioner has now filed this fresh petition impugning t
Candidates must act diligently and promptly when disputing recruitment disqualifications, as delays can negate their claims even if circumstances change subsequently.
The opinion of the medical experts of the appointing authority shall prevail, and the parameters of fitness and required standards for appointment in the Indian Navy cannot be judicially reviewed.
The Court upheld military medical standards, ruling that civilian doctors' evaluations cannot contradict specialized military assessments of fitness for Armed Forces recruitment.
Delay and laches in communicating inability to report for recruitment process can bar a petitioner from obtaining relief, especially when there is an ongoing recruitment process.
Timely communication and participation in recruitment processes are essential, and failure to do so can result in dismissal based on delay and laches.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the opinions of the Armed Forces/Navy specialists in matters of medical fitness for recruitment, particularly in t....
The court upheld the findings of Medical Boards declaring candidates unfit for recruitment in the Indian Air Force, emphasizing the importance of compliance with established medical standards and dis....
Point of law: Recruitment - Declaration as unfit - petitioner unfit for the reason of “Multiple Keloids” - Rightly declared as unfit.
Medical Board decisions on fitness for military service are final, and significant delays in challenging such decisions can result in the dismissal of petitions for relief.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
