Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Communication Components Antenna Inc. – Appellant
Versus
Mobi Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's denial on extension for replies. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeal challenges patent invalidation. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments focused on pleadings and issues. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. importance of framing issues in litigation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. remand for reconsideration of patent grounds. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Reply affidavits have not been filed by the respondents despite opportunity having been granted. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for further time to file reply affidavits. However, keeping in view the fact that notices had been issued in the present matter on 26th August, 2021, this Court is of the view that the respondents have had sufficient time to file reply affidavits. Accordingly, the request for additional time to file reply affidavits is declined.
2. It is pertinent to mention that the present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 10th August, 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.C. No.38 of 2012 filed in CS(COMM) No.977 of 2016, to the extent that it invalidates the Appellant's patent, numbered Indian Patent Number IN240893 (hereinafter, "IN240893"), on the ground under Sections 64 (1)(h) and (k) of the Ind
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
