SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited – Appellant
Versus
Controller of Patents – Respondent


Table of Content
1. limitations in filing revocation petitions (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. conditions for filing revocation under section 64 (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. absence of limitation period for revocation (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. rejection of implication of limitation act on revocation (Para 14 , 16)
5. dismissal of current revocation application (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

I.A. 5674/2022 in C.O.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/2021

2. This is an application by the Petitioners seeking to place on record affidavits of the expert, Dr. Jeffrey A. Stafford. The said affidavits, annexed to the present application, are taken on record, subject to any objections of the Petitioners, who may wish to controvert the same by way of their own affidavits, if required.

3. Accordingly, I.A. 5674/2022 is disposed of.

I.A. 3419/2022 in C.O.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/2021

4. This is an application seeking dismissal of the present revocation petition on the ground that it is barred by limitation. The patent in this case of which revocation is sought is Indian Patent 268846 (hereinafter "IN'846") titled `Glucopyranosyl-substituted Benzenol derivatives, dr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top