SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Xchanging Technology Services India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to income tax assessment order (Para 1)
2. contention on ddt rates and itat binding decisions (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on reassessing the prior decision (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31st March 2021 for Assessment Year 2018-19 passed under Section 264 of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961. Petitioner also seeks directions to Respondent No.2 to issue refund amounting to INR 71,41,29,257/-, on account of excess Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid, within a time bound period. Petitioner also seeks a declaration that Section 115-o be read in a manner that is not inconsistent with Article 10 and other provisions of the India- Mauritius DTAA.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the beneficial rate of 5% prescribed under Article 10(2) of the India-Mauritius DTAA shall prevail over the DDT rate of 15% (20.36% after grossing up with 15% rate as provided u/s 115-O of the Act plus applicable surcharge and cess).

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent No. 1 has rejected Petitioner's request for refund of the DDT paid in excess of the benefici

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top