SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Telecommnunications Consultants India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anil Bhasin – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

CM No. 45328/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CAV 94/2021 & CAV 95/2021

3. Since counsel for the caveator/respondent no.1 enters appearance, caveat stands discharged.

CM(M) 1162/2021 & CM No. 45327/2021 (for stay)

4. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns orders passed by the Additional District Judge-01, South, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter `Commercial Court') in a commercial suit bearing CS(COMM) No.401/2019, being (i) order dated 28th September, 2021, whereby the application filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1 (plaintiff in the suit) to bring original documents on record has been allowed subject to payment of cumulative costs of Rs.20,000/-; and (ii) order dated 16th November, 2021, whereby the said documents have been allowed to be exhibited by the Court.

5. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are given hereinafter:

(i) The commercial suit for recovery of Rs.18,23,992/- with pendente lite and future interest was filed by the respondent no.1 in April, 2009 in respect of work orders awarded to the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top