Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Padma Bhandari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners' claim to property and law citations. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents' defense and ownership claims. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's reference to previous judgments and legal interpretations. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 5. powers of executing court and removal of unlawful occupation. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. legal principles on time barred claims and execution. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. equitable jurisdiction and wrongful acts. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. conclusion of the case dismissal. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 03rd March, 2021 passed by the Administrative Civil Judge (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter `Executing Court') in Execution Petition No.350/2017, whereby warrants of possession have been issued qua the portion shown as point `X' in the site plan (Ex-PW1/A), with a further direction to the bailiff to break up the locks and doors and get the portion, illegally occupied by the petitioners (legal heirs of the judgment debtor/original defendant) behind the portion marked as `X' in the site plan, vacated from the petitioners.
2.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
