IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Akshay Suri - Appellant
Versus
Central Reserve Police Force - Respondent
W.P. (C) 13137 of 2021 & CM 41427 of 2021
Decided On : 17-12-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant declared medically unfit due to specific medical conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on medical examination procedure and opinions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. order for further medical examination by a specific hospital. (Para 6) |
| 4. disposal of petition with directives regarding medical examination. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--The petitioner had applied for the `Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination, 2019'.
2. The petitioner was declared medically unfit for appointment in the Detailed Medical Examination on the following grounds:-
1. DOV BE - 6/12 Rt, 6/9 Lt
2. Tremor
3. Helix Vulgus (Rt)
3. The respondents thereafter referred the petitioner for medical examination to the Jawahar Lal Nehru Hospital, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as `JLN Hospital'). It is the case of the petitioner that during such examination the petitioner was found to be medically fit, however, inspite of the same in the Review Medical Examination the petitioner was declared unfit due to Helix Vulgus (Rt).
4. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.12.2021, the respondents have produced before us the original medical record of the petitioner. The doctors of the Review Medical Examination Board are also present in Court today.
5. The medical documents produced by the respondents shows that the JLN Hospital, vide a report dated 23.10.2021, had found the petitioner to be orthopedically fit. The doctors who are present in Court explain that the petitioner was not referred to the JLN Hospital for an orthopedic opinion, but only for an X-Ray. They submit that there is an over-writing on the referral letter so as to include an orthopedic opinion. The doctors submit that in any case, the said opinion is not binding on the respondents as the civilian doctor would not be in a position to ascertain the standards required for appointment in the respondent service.
6. Be that as it may, as we have an opinion from the JLN Hospital which declares the petitioner to be orthopedically fit, in the peculiar facts of the present case, we are of the opinion that petitioner should be examined by the Army R&R Hospital, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `R&R Hospital') for his alleged Helix Vulgus (Rt). For this purpose, the respondent shall request the R&R Hospital to constitute a Board of doctors consisting of a specialist Orthopedic and give an appointment to the petitioner for being examined within a period of ten days from today. The report of the R&R Hospital shall be considered as final, with no party being allowed to challenge the same. The respondent shall act upon the appointment application of the petitioner in accordance with the report that is received from the R&R Hospital within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the report. The report received from the R&R Hospital shall also be shared with the petitioner.
7. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
8. The original medical record of the petitioner is returned back to the respondents.
The court mandated further medical evaluation by a specialist to ensure compliance with established medical standards in recruitment procedures.
The court has the authority to direct a specialized medical examination to resolve disputes over medical fitness for appointment, with the report from the specialized hospital being considered final ....
The need for a specialist examination to resolve disputes over medical fitness, with the resulting report being considered final and binding on both parties.
The court ruled on the need for specialized medical examination when conflicting fitness reports exist, ensuring authoritative evaluation governs final decisions on medical fitness.
The necessity of independent medical assessment by competent authorities in adjudicating fitness for roles in law enforcement is paramount, ensuring procedural fairness.
The report from the R&R Hospital on the petitioner's medical condition is considered final and binding, with no party allowed to challenge it.
The court emphasized the necessity for military fitness assessments to adhere to military medical standards, deeming civilian medical evaluations insufficient for determining service eligibility.
Re-examination is warranted when conflicting medical assessments arise, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to medical evaluation standards and proper certification.
Conflicting medical reports and lack of conclusive evidence can lead to a court ordering re-examination to resolve discrepancies.
Medical fitness evaluations must adhere to standardized guidelines to ensure fair assessments of candidates regarding weight and vision qualifications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.