SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Akshay Suri - Appellant
Versus
Central Reserve Police Force - Respondent
W.P. (C) 13137 of 2021 & CM 41427 of 2021
Decided On : 17-12-2021




The court mandated further medical evaluation by a specialist to ensure compliance with established medical standards in recruitment procedures.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Police Recruitment Regulations - Medical Examination Standards - Petition challenging the medical unfitness declaration for recruitment based on Helix Vulgus and other medical conditions. The original medical opinions indicate fitness, warranting further examination by a specialist. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Administrative procedures - Necessity of ensuring fair review and examination of candidates against established medical standards. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was initially declared medically unfit after a Detailed Medical Examination, but a subsequent examination at a different facility found him orthopedically fit. (Para 3)

Findings of Court:
Court directs examination by a specialist board from R&R Hospital and mandates the decision based on their report to be final. (Paras 6-7)

Issues: The court addressed the legitimacy of the medical examination reports and the fairness of the recruitment process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for adherence to proper medical standards and protocols in recruitment procedures, ensuring the candidate's rights are respected. (Paras 5-6)

Result: Petition disposed of with directions for further medical examination.

Table of Content
1. appellant declared medically unfit due to specific medical conditions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's observations on medical examination procedure and opinions. (Para 4 , 5)
3. order for further medical examination by a specific hospital. (Para 6)
4. disposal of petition with directives regarding medical examination. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--The petitioner had applied for the `Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination, 2019'.

2. The petitioner was declared medically unfit for appointment in the Detailed Medical Examination on the following grounds:-

    1. DOV BE - 6/12 Rt, 6/9 Lt

    2. Tremor

    3. Helix Vulgus (Rt)

3. The respondents thereafter referred the petitioner for medical examination to the Jawahar Lal Nehru Hospital, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as `JLN Hospital'). It is the case of the petitioner that during such examination the petitioner was found to be medically fit, however, inspite of the same in the Review Medical Examination the petitioner was declared unfit due to Helix Vulgus (Rt).

4. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.12.2021, the respondents have produced before us the original medical record of the petitioner. The doctors of the Review Medical Examination Board are also present in Court today.

5. The medical documents produced by the respondents shows that the JLN Hospital, vide a report dated 23.10.2021, had found the petitioner to be orthopedically fit. The doctors who are present in Court explain that the petitioner was not referred to the JLN Hospital for an orthopedic opinion, but only for an X-Ray. They submit that there is an over-writing on the referral letter so as to include an orthopedic opinion. The doctors submit that in any case, the said opinion is not binding on the respondents as the civilian doctor would not be in a position to ascertain the standards required for appointment in the respondent service.

6. Be that as it may, as we have an opinion from the JLN Hospital which declares the petitioner to be orthopedically fit, in the peculiar facts of the present case, we are of the opinion that petitioner should be examined by the Army R&R Hospital, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `R&R Hospital') for his alleged Helix Vulgus (Rt). For this purpose, the respondent shall request the R&R Hospital to constitute a Board of doctors consisting of a specialist Orthopedic and give an appointment to the petitioner for being examined within a period of ten days from today. The report of the R&R Hospital shall be considered as final, with no party being allowed to challenge the same. The respondent shall act upon the appointment application of the petitioner in accordance with the report that is received from the R&R Hospital within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the report. The report received from the R&R Hospital shall also be shared with the petitioner.

7. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.

8. The original medical record of the petitioner is returned back to the respondents.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top