Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Namita Verma – Appellant
Versus
Momman Khan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filings of original documents not required. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ex-parte proceedings impact document production. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. inspection of original suffices if defendants rejoin. (Para 6) |
| 4. petition disposed with all applications. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done in physical Court. Hybrid mode is permitted in cases where permission is being sought from the Court.
2. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 10th April, 2019 by which the Trial Court in CS No.8953/16 titled Namit Verma & Ors. v. Momman Khan & Ors. has directed the production of original documents in the application under Order XIII Rule 1 CPC filed by the Plaintiffs/Petitioners (hereinafter "Plaintiffs"). The Plaintiffs herein had sought permission merely for dispensation of the requirement to file original documents on record. The Plaintiffs instead sought directions to produce the relevant original documents in Court, for the Defendants to inspect the same at a convenient date, in terms of the judgment of the ld. Single Judge of this Court in Aktiebolaget Volvo and Ors. v. R. Venkatachalam and Ors., 160 (2009) DLT 100. The relevant extra
The court concluded that the requirement for original documents pertains only to their production for inspection, allowing plaintiffs to avoid filing originals.
The central legal point established is that the requirement under Section 62 of the Evidence Act and Order 13 Rule 1 of the CPC regarding production of original documents is for inspection of the cou....
The court held that secondary evidence obtained through the RTI Act can be allowed in court when original documents are unavailable, emphasizing the necessity of proper reasoning for rejecting such a....
The court ruled that secondary evidence can be admissible under the CPC when original documents are unavailable, and trial courts must provide cogent reasoning for rejecting such applications.
The defendant can produce documents subsequently only in special and extenuating circumstances with the court's permission, and procedures cannot be implemented to cause injustice or prejudice to any....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
