SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1537

BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Sampa Roy – Appellant
Versus
Mili Roy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Abhisek Banerjee, Surajit Mitra
For the Respondent: Soujanya Bandyopadhyay

JUDGMENT :

BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.

1. This revisional application has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 23rd February, 2022 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 6th Court, Howrah in Title Suit No. 840 of 2018 rejecting the prayer of the petitioners for discovery, production and inspection of documents under Order XI Rule 12, 14 and 15 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE .

2. The brief fact of the case is that petitioners filed a suit being Title suit No. 840 of 2018 for declaration and permanent injunction against the opposite parties contending, inter alia, that one Probhat Kumar Roy, since deceased, purchased the suit property in benami of defendant No. 1 Mili Roy by dint of a deed of sale no. 119 for the year 1995. The opposite party No. 2, Himanshu Roy also filed a suit against petitioner No. 1 praying for a decree for eviction of licensee being Title suit No. 875 of 2018. Both the aforesaid suits are being tried analogously by the learned trial court. The petitioners filed an application under Order XI Rule 12, 14 and 15 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE for discovery, production and inspection of original deeds bein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top