SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Sandeep Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Janak Kapur – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

I.A. 3869/2019 in CS(OS) 188/2018 and I.A. 10569/2021in CS(OS) 192/2021

1. These are litigations among the members of one family. IA 10569/2021in CS (OS) 192/2021 and IA 3869/2019 in CS (OS) 188/2018, at the instance of Mr. Sandeep Kapur, the plaintiff in CS(OS) 192/2021 and Defendant 1 in CS (OS) 188/2018, object to the appearance of the advocate, who presently appears on behalf of the plaintiffs in CS (OS) 188/2018 and on behalf of the defendants in CS (OS) 192/2021.

2. I have heard Mr. Virmani, learned Senior Counsel for the applicants in these applications at considerable length. Mr. Virmani took me through the history of these litigations and to the involvement of Mr. Singhal in the confabulations which took place during the course of the discussions in this matter.

3. The case set out in these applications, qua the involvement of Mr. Singhal is that Mr. Singhal was a close friend of the family and closely associated with Mr. L.R. Kapur, the late father of the parties in these disputes. Mr. Virmani submits that his client was completely unaware of the involvement of Mr. Singhal in these proceedings. On 3rd December, 2017, the applicant received a legal no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top