Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Tharvinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Viresh Chopra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges amendment order. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs failed to appear in court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. background of trial court's orders. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. arguments regarding court fees and amendments. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 5. dismissal due to non-compliance. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. conclusion and future implications of dismissal. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. In the present revision petition, the Petitioners/Defendants (hereinafter "Defendants") have challenged the impugned order dated 28th July, 2020 by which the application of the Respondents/Plaintiffs (hereinafter "Plaintiffs") under Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been allowed and the application of the Defendants under proviso to Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed in CS No.610018/16 titled Viresh Chopra & Ors. v. Tharvinder Singh & Ors..
3. Vide the impugned order, the Plaintiffs were directed to file the amended plaint, on the next date of hearing or within 15 days upon resumption of normal hearing, whichever was later.
4. In the present revision petition, the ld. Counsel for the Plaintiffs seeks an adjournment today on the ground that
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
