Back
JYOTI SINGH
Rachna Mediratta – Appellant
Versus
Girdhari Lal
And – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to trial court orders. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's contentions regarding abatement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners argue procedural errors. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. notice of parties and procedural disputes. (Para 8 , 12) |
| 5. amendment discretion principles. (Para 14 , 17) |
| 6. court’s reasoning on amendment applications. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. subsequent events affect amendments. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 8. conclusion on trial court’s discretion. (Para 25 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J.
CM(M) 280/2022 & C.M. APPL. 26150/2022
C.R.P. 48/2022 & C.M. APPL. 17201/2022 (Stay) 26140/2022 (early disposal)
1. CM(M) 280/2022 has been filed by the Petitioners laying a challenge to an order dated 24.02.2022 passed by the Trial Court in Civil Suit No.626/2019 titled `Girdhari Lal Tolani v. Ashok Kumar and Others' whereby two applications filed by Respondent No.1/Sh. Girdhari Lal herein have been allowed, one under Order I Rule 10 CPC and the other under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. C.R.P. 48/2022 has been filed by the Petitioners assailing order dated 23.03.2022 whereby application filed by the Petitioners under Order VI Rule 18 CPC has been dismissed by the Trial Court. Petitioners herein are newly added Defen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
