SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Ravi Kumar Meena - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 13900 of 2021
Decided On : 07-12-2021




Right to pro rata pension affirmed, contingent on verification of eligibility based on precedents; procedural fairness mandated by providing written reasons for any denials.

Headnote:(A) Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India - Writ petition for pro rata pension - Petitioners claim similar treatment to previous petitions granted relief in respect of pro rata pension - Respondents directed to verify and grant relief if eligibility is established. (Para 1, 4)

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - Right to be heard - Petitioners must be provided reasons in writing if not found entitled to the relief sought. (Para 4)

(C) Interest on arrears - Interest of 7% per annum to be paid on delayed pro rata pension. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners claimed entitlement to pro rata pension based on similar cases, following discharge from service, supported by requisite No Objection Certificates.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to process the pension applications based on verification, while protecting the right to appeal and providing written reasons if entitlements are denied.

Issues: The main issue addressed was the petitioners' eligibility for pro rata pension in relation to previous case law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized compliance with procedural fairness and the necessity of providing reasons for denial of entitlements, highlighting the expectations for expeditious fulfillment of pension payments.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to grant pension relief.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for pro rata pension claims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. right of verification and appeal maintained. (Para 3)
3. order for pension payment contingent on verification. (Para 4)
4. interest accrual on delayed pension payments. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.43876/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

W.P. (C) No.13900/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in the present petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, state that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the present petition be disposed of.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents-Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.

5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top