SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Raghav Kumar Sharma - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 3543 of 2021
Decided On : 18-03-2021




Right to equal treatment in pension matters ensures that similarly situated individuals receive equivalent benefits, reinforced by prior decisions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, and 226 - Petition for pro rata pension - Petitioners claimed similar treatment as in prior judgments for pro rata pension - Respondents directed to verify eligibility and grant relief accordingly - Arrears to attract interest if not paid in stipulated time. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Equality and Non-Discrimination - Principle of 'similarly situated' individuals entitled to equal treatment in matters of pension. (Para 1)

(C) Judicial Discretion - The court retains discretion to determine if petitioners are similarly placed, upholding decisions in earlier cases. (Para 3)

(D) Payment and Interest - Failure to pay arrears within twelve weeks results in interest at 7% per annum. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought entitlement to pro rata pension, claiming similar circumstances as in Brijlal Kumar and Govind Kumar Srivastava cases. They had provided requisite No Objection Certificates.

Findings of Court:
The Indian Air Force is mandated to evaluate the petitioners' entitlement to pro rata pension and make corresponding payments.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioners are similarly placed as in the referenced decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for equal treatment in pension matters, conditioning relief on verification of the petitioners' eligibility.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. claim of pro rata pension for similarly placed petitioners. (Para 1 , 2)
2. agreement on terms for petition disposal. (Para 3)
3. directions for payment and verification process. (Para 4)
4. interest on unpaid pension arrears. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

CM APPL. 10723/2021 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3543/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.

5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top