IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Rashtriy Higher Secondary School - Appellant
Versus
Central Board of Secondary Education - Respondent
W.P.(C) 443 of 2020
Decided On : 07-12-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rejection of application due to allegations of deficiencies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's reasoning on responsibility of cbse for inspection. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. arguments surrounding the responsibility for inspection delays. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court orders setting aside of cbse's decision. (Para 9) |
| 5. directions for reconsideration of application and future actions. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual hearing].
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to a communication dated 17.08.2019, by which the respondent-Central Board of Secondary Education ["CBSE"] rejected the application of the petitioner- Rashhtriy Higher Secondary School ["the School"] for affiliation.
2. The School was established in the year 2002 in District Shonbhadra, in the State of Uttar Pradesh and is affiliated to the Uttar Pradesh Education Board. On 30.06.2015, the petitioner sought to switch over its affiliation from the Uttar Pradesh Education Board to CBSE for which it successfully submitted an online application form. The CBSE, by a communication dated 20.11.2015, identified various deficiencies in the application for recognition. The petitioner responded to this communication on 15.12.2015 and claims to have answered each of the deficiencies raised by CBSE. The CBSE thereafter constituted an Inspection Committee for inspection of the School. This was communicated to the members of the Inspecting Committee by a communication dated 03.02.2016, a copy whereof has been placed on record along with counter affidavit filed by CBSE. It appears that no further progress was made thereafter until CBSE issued the impugned communication dated 17.08.2019.
3. By the impugned letter, the petitioner's application has been rejected with the following observations:
"1. The school is required to submit an affidavit duly supported with evidence to this effect that the applicant school had intimated to the concerned Education Department of the State about the application made to CBSE for seeking affiliation to the Board.
2. The School is required to furnish land documents i.e. Lease deed/Sale deed in favour of School/Society running the school duly executed in the office of the Sub Registrar along with land certificates as per appendix VI prescribed in the Affiliation Bye Laws duly signed by Competent Authority to the effect that the said entire land constitutes as single plot.
3. The School is required to submit an affidavit of NPC in original duly sworn in before a first-class magistrate by the President or Secretary of the Society/Trust running the school to the effect that the Society is of nonproprietary character in nature.
4. The school is required to submit an affidavit in original duly sworn in before the First-Class Magistrate to the effect that the students of "State pattern class, from IX XII will be closed in phased manner"
5. The School is required to submit last 03 years State Board result of class X."
4. While issuing notice in this petition, by an order dated 14.01.2020, the Court recorded a prima facie observation that the impugned order does not appear to be sustainable as the entire blame cannot be placed on the petitioner if the Inspection Committee constituted by the CBSE did not carry out an inspection. An opportunity was given to the learned counsel for CBSE to take instructions, and to file a counter affidavit if CBSE wished to resist the petitioner. The counter affidavit has since been filed.
5. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the decision of CBSE is wholly irrational inasmuch as the petitioner's application has been rejected due to failure of the Inspecting Committee to conduct the inspection and submit its report within the time stipulated. Mr. Sharawat submits that the petitioner was not to blame for these state of affairs, and ought not to be meted with the consequences.
6.
Public authorities must timely process applications without undue burden on applicants, and failure to act cannot be grounds for rejection.
The main legal point established is that a public authority cannot solely reject an application based on the failure of an inspection committee, and must consider the application in accordance with t....
Educational institutions must comply with affiliation regulations; a grace period of three years was granted for compliance with provisions, conditionally allowing current students to appear for exam....
The court affirmed that compliance with statutory requirements for educational institution affiliation is mandatory and cannot be waived, even for minority institutions, emphasizing that violations c....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of providing an opportunity of hearing, supplying the inspection report, and giving sufficient time to rectify deficiencies befo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.