SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Harshit Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Chander Shekhar Dhawan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

O.M.P. (I)(COMM.) 315/2019 & I.A. 14094/2021 (u/S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on behalf of Respondents seeking modification of Order dated 12th October, 2021)

1. This Court, by way of a separate order passed today in ARB. P. 172/2020, has appointed a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes pertaining to and arising from a `Deed of Partnership' dated 05th July, 2014, executed between Late Mr. Chander Shekhar Dhawan [Respondent No. 1] and the Petitioner, in relation to the constitution of a partnership firm in the name and style of Dhawan Printers and Packers [Respondent No. 2]. The deceased partner is now represented through his legal representatives.

2. With the arbitral tribunal in place, the question that now arises is whether any interim measure is required to be put in place till such time the tribunal enters upon the reference.

Facts in brief:

3. Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 each held 50% share in Respondent No. 2 firm. Petitioner contends that he was initially being paid a sum Rs.20,000/- towards his share in the income of Respondent No. 2 firm. Later, this was reduced to Rs.10,000/- per mon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top