Narendra Kumar Saxena vs Surendra Kumar Saxena

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Narendra Kumar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar Saxena – Respondent

Table of Content
1. dissolution of partnership firm and property ownership (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arbitration clause in partnership deed (Para 5 , 6)
3. pre-requisites for arbitration and jurisdiction issues (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 12)
4. validity of arbitration agreement and stamp duty (Para 17 , 19 , 21)
5. jurisdiction considerations for disputes involving immovable property (Para 22 , 24 , 26)
6. dismissal of petition for lack of jurisdiction (Para 28)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)

I.A. 13204/2021

This is an application filed by the respondent seeking permission to file additional documents on record.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the additional documents are taken on record.

Application is disposed of.

ARB.P. 383/2021

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking an appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the dispute between the parties.

2. The case of the petitioners is, they and Surender Kumar Saxena with Neerja Saxena established an unregistered partnership firm carrying on the business under the name and style "M/s Bharat Interlock Tiles" having its office in Alwar, Rajsthan. The partnership fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTV.KAMESWAR RAONarendra Kumar Saxena – AppellantVersusSurendra Kumar Saxena – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Narendra Kumar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar Saxena – Respondent