SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition under article 227 against cmm orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. overview of facts leading to the petition. (Para 3)
3. contentions regarding cmm's jurisdictional limits. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. issues raised in the petition for consideration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. legal observations regarding sarfaesi act and civil orders. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. cmm's mandate under sarfaesi act clarified. (Para 34)
7. final orders and directions issued. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns orders passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM), South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, being (i) the order dated 30th March, 2021, whereby a further period of ninety days has been granted to the court appointed receiver for complying with the order dated 15th October, 2019, whereby the said receiver was appointed to take possession of the secured asset; and, (ii) the order dated 17th August, 2021, whereby the Court of the CMM has failed to pass any orders qua the extension of time in view of the status quo orders pass

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top