SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
EY Global Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to aar rulings based on amalgamation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. services provided by eygsl (uk) and eygbs (india). (Para 4 , 5)
3. tax implications regarding payments and services. (Para 6)
4. decision of the aar on tax classification. (Para 7 , 8)
5. parties' arguments on the applicability of supreme court ruling. (Para 9 , 10)
6. court's analysis based on legal precedents. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. rejection of aar's reliance on prior case law. (Para 15 , 16)
8. conclusion on the nature of payments not being royalty. (Para 17 , 18)
9. outcome of the petitions. (Para 19)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J.

1. These petition(s) challenge the Rulings/Orders both dated 10.08.2016 of the Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'AAR') in the Application(s), being AAR No. 1043 of 2011; AAR No. 1408 of 2012; and AAR No. 1409 of 2012.

2. The Application, being AAR No. 1043 of 2011, was filed by EY Global Services Ltd. (formally known as EYGBS Ltd). The Application(s), being AAR No. 1408 of 2012 and 1409 of 2012, were filed by M/s EYME Technologies Private Limited and EYGBS (India) Private Limited, respectively. As recorded in the Impugned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top