Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajendra Mittal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
NCML Batala Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for appointment of arbitrator due to contract disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consent for appointment of a sole arbitrator. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. appointment and conduct of arbitration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. disposition of petition and communication to arbitrator. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of Arbitrator on behalf of respondent to adjudicate the disputes with respondent.
2. Petitioner was awarded construction of civil and associated works for proposed Silos Complex at Batala by respondent vide Tender document bearing No.NCML/BATALA/CIVIL/2017-18/04 dated 28.02.2018 and subsequently through a Contract Agreement dated 14.05.2018, 30.08.2019 and 08.09.2020 to be completed in a time frame of 8 months. Respondent failed to provide land and other miscellaneous support, due to which the petitioner was unable to execute the work, therefore, the project is running onto its 40th Month.
3. According to petitioner, due to failure of the obligations of respondent, petitioner issued the Termination Notice cum Notice invoking Arbitration dated 30.09.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
