SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Shivakriti Agro (P.) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Umaiza Infracon LLP – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter "the Act"] seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes pertaining to the Facility Agreement dated 30th September, 2019 which contains an arbitration clause, produced hereunder:

    "Article 6--Dispute Resolution and Jurisdiction

    6.1 This Agreement shall, in all respects be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India.

    6.2 The Parties hereto undertake to use their best efforts to resolve any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement through consultation in good faith and mutual understanding, provided that such consultation shall not prejudice the exercise of any right or remedy of either Party hereto by any such Party in respect of any such dispute.

    6.3 If any dispute of difference that may arise between the Parties (other than any inter se dispute among the Requesting Parties, which shall be outside the scope of this Agreement), and the same is not resolved in mutual good faith discussion, it shall be decided by way of final and binding arbitration to be held in accordance wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top