SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1231

V. KAMESWAR RAO
Aditya Birla Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Siti Networks Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Ravitej Chilumuri, Ms. Mihika Jalan, Ms. Raddhika Khanna, Ms. Pragya Dahiya and Ms. Aanchal Tikmani, Advocates, for the Petitioner in ARB.P. 474/2022.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Ms. Raddhika Khanna, Mr. Ravitej, Ms. Milika Jalan, Ms. Pragya Dahiya, Mr. Siddhant Kumar, Mr. Shivank Diddi, Mr. Amer Vaid, Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria and Ms. Ashima Chauhan, Advocates, for the Petitioner in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 414/2021, I.As. 4739/2022, 6182/2022, 7938/2022 & 10296/2022.
Mr. Joy Basu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritwika Nanda, Ms. Akshita Salampuria and Mr. Kanak Bose, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Raj Gandhi, Mr. Vardaan Bajaj, Ms. Bindi Dave and Mr. Pranay Tuteja, Advocates for R-2.
Mr. Samar Singh Kachwaha, Ms. Shivangi Nanda and Ms. Kavita Vinayak, Advocates for R-3.

Table of Content
1. facts of the case and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of the agreements and key provisions (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments presented by the petitioner (Para 46 , 63 , 64)
4. court's observations regarding arbitration applicability (Para 204 , 205 , 206)
5. final decision and order (Para 250)

JUDGMENT

INDEX

Sr. No.Particulars
1.FACTS IN ARB.P.474/2022
1.1Submissions on behalf of Petitioner
1.2Submissions on behalf of Respondent No.2
1.3Submissions on behalf of Respondent No.3
1.4Rejoinder Submissions
1.5Additional Submissions on behalf of Respondent No.2
2.FACTS and Submissions on behalf of Petitioner in O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 414/2021
2.1Submissions on behalf of Respondent No.1
2.2Submissions on behalf of Respondent No.2
2.3Rejoinder Submissions
3.ANALYSIS IN ARB.P.474/2022
4.ANALYSIS IN O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 414/2021

V. Kameswar Rao, J.

I.A. No. 6182/2022 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 414/2021 (by the petitioner seeking condonation of 6 days delay in filing reply to IA No.4739/2022)

1.1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

1.2. The delay of 6 days in filing reply to the application is condoned and the reply is taken on record.

1.3. Application is di












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top