SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
S.S. Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and relief sought for delayed retirement benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning for not interfering with tribunal's order. (Para 4)
3. dismissal of writ petition and closure of applications. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.03.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in O.A. No. 650/2021.

2. Mr Sanjay Kumar, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that, the only grievance of the petitioner, which survived in the second round before the Tribunal, concerned payment of interest delayed release of retiral benefits.

3. On the last date i.e., 09.11.2021, we had asked Mr Kumar to place on record a copy of the O.A.No.420/2013, which was filed by the petitioner in the first round.

3.1. Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 09.11.2021, Mr Kumar has placed a copy of the O.A. No.420/2013 on record. The reliefs sought in the said O.A. are set forth hereafter:

    "(i) To call for the records of the case;

    (ii) To quash and set aside the impugned charge memo No. C.No.5-vig/Dl-IV/2012/3306 dated 30.07.2012;

    (iii) To direct the respondents to c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top