SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Radhika Ashar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for postgraduate ayush courses. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the timeline and representations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's reasoning on cut-off date and hardship. (Para 7 , 10)
4. clarification on entitlement based on cut-off timing. (Para 8 , 9)
5. conclusion and final order in the writ petition. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual hearing].

1. The petitioners are candidates for admission to postgraduate AYUSH courses. They are students of the Bachelors Degree courses [BUMS/BAMS/BSMS/BHMS] and have taken the All India Ayush Postgraduate Entrance Test, 2021 ["AIAPGET-2021"] on 18.09.2021. Their grievance in this writ petition is that the eligibility qualifications for the postgraduate courses provides for completion of compulsory one year rotating internship [which is part of the bachelors degree course] by 31.12.2021, whereas the petitioners will complete their internships only in January, 2022.

2. The National Testing Agency [respondent No. 3] called for applications for the AIAPGET-2021 by a public notice dated 03.08.2021. An

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top