SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Pratibha Gaur - Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14862 of 2021
Decided On : 31-12-2021




The court upheld that a pregnant woman's right to terminate a pregnancy beyond the statutory limit can be granted due to severe foetal health abnormalities affecting her mental health, interpreting the MTP Act liberally.

Headnote:(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 3(2)(b)(i) - Writ petition for medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks due to severe foetal abnormalities - Petitioner diagnosed with Tetralogy of Fallot with Absent Pulmonary Valve Syndrome - Multiple medical opinions highlight risks to both mother’s mental health and child’s quality of life. (Paras 4, 18, 27)

(B) Right to Reproductive Choice - Rights associated with reproduction as integral to personal liberty under Article 21 - Courts have permitted termination at late stages when substantial foetal abnormalities exist, considering both physical and mental health impacts. (Paras 26, 36, 28)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, 33 years old, sought permission after 28 weeks of pregnancy for termination due to severe heart anomalies in the foetus. Multiple medical boards confirmed significant risks associated with the condition. (Paras 2, 4, 27)

Findings of Court:
Continuing pregnancy would substantially harm the mental health of the Petitioner; thus, the request for termination justified. Permission granted to undergo procedure at medical facility of her choice. (Paras 29, 31)

Issues: Whether the Petitioner can undergo abortion beyond the statutory limit due to severe foetal congenital defects. (Para 1)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for a liberal interpretation of the MTP Act to support women’s rights and health, allowing termination based on the cumulative effects of foetal health issues on maternal mental health. (Paras 29, 30)

Result: Writ petition allowed; Petitioner permitted to undergo medical termination of pregnancy.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks medical termination relief. (Para 1)
2. factual background of pregnancy complications. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court orders medical board examination. (Para 4 , 5)
4. medical board opinions regarding foetal condition. (Para 6)
5. petitioner argues mental health risk. (Para 7 , 8)
6. reproductive rights emphasized in arguments. (Para 9 , 10)
7. respondent's counterarguments against termination. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
8. legal provisions on pregnancy termination examined. (Para 14 , 15)
9. legitimacy of current case and provisions discussed. (Para 16 , 17)
10. interpretation of mtp act and mental health. (Para 18)
11. judicial precedents supporting termination under risk. (Para 19 , 20)
12. analysis of 'mental health' in legal context. (Para 21 , 22)
13. emphasis on judicial interpretation of rights. (Para 23 , 24)
14. current decision upholding reproductive rights. (Para 25 , 26)
15. conclusion on mental health impacts. (Para 27 , 28)
16. court allows termination of pregnancy. (Para 29)
17. final order and legal protective measures. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT

1. Present writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

    "a. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to undergo Medical Termination of the Pregnancy.

    b. For an order directing the Respondent No. 3 for setting up an expert panel of doctors to assess the pregnancy and offer MTP to the petitioner in need of the procedure beyond the prescribed 20 weeks limit.

    c. For any other order/direction that this Hon`ble Court may deem fit."

2. As per the case set out in the petition, Petitioner is 33 years old and has been undergoing regular check-ups from the 5th week of her pregnancy. From the ultrasonography report dated 31.10.2021, conducted during the 20th week of gestation, it was revealed that there was choroid plexus cyst in the left lateral ventricle of the foetus. However, since the foetus was only 20 weeks old, foetal echocardiography was not performed. On completion of 24 weeks, foetal Echo-Doppler test was done on 02.12.2021 and various anomalies were found in the heart of the foetus, viz., Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) with Absent Pulmonary Valve Syndrome (APV), presence of Pulmonary Stenosis and Regurgitation with Narrow Pulmonary Valves, Dilated Branch Pulmonary Artery and Large Malaligned VSD with overriding of Aorta.

3. Thereafter, Petitioner consulted many Doctors, including Paediatric Cardiologists, in different hospitals and as per the last medical opinion received by her on 15.12.2021, infants born with condition of TOF have 50 per cent chance of survival in the very first year of their birth and even if they do survive the first year, repeated surgeries have to be carried out and success of the surgeries depends upon the stimuli of the baby to the environment. Since the permissible limit of 24 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as `MTP Act') as amended by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 was over, Petitioner approached this Court seeking a direction to the Respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of pregnancy.

4. On 22.12.2021, this Court directed Respondent No.3/AIIMS to constitute a Medical Board at the earliest to examine the Petitioner, who had on the said date completed 28 weeks of pregnancy and after examination, to furnish its report regarding the necessity and feasibility of medical termination of the pregnancy. Relevant part of the order reads as follows:

    "2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the medical opinion based on the petitioner`s ultrasound report and other medical test, it has been found that the petitioner`s foetus is suffering from various serious deformities and therefore, has very grim chances of survival. Learned counsel for the therefore prays that the petitioner be permitted to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy.

    xxx xxx

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top