Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Pratibha Gaur – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks medical termination relief. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of pregnancy complications. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court orders medical board examination. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. medical board opinions regarding foetal condition. (Para 6) |
| 5. petitioner argues mental health risk. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. reproductive rights emphasized in arguments. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. respondent's counterarguments against termination. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 8. legal provisions on pregnancy termination examined. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 9. legitimacy of current case and provisions discussed. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 10. interpretation of mtp act and mental health. (Para 18) |
| 11. judicial precedents supporting termination under risk. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 12. analysis of 'mental health' in legal context. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 13. emphasis on judicial interpretation of rights. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 14. current decision upholding reproductive rights. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 15. conclusion on mental health impacts. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 16. court allows termination of pregnancy. (Para 29) |
| 17. final order and legal protective measures. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
1. Present writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"a. For a writ of mandamu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
