SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Narendra Babu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual context of the matrimonial dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. argument for police investigation necessity (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's recognition of evidence control (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. law on complaints and investigations (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
5. upholding of lower court's decision (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner/complainant assailing the order dated 18.01.2020 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CC No. 1866/16, whereby the petitioner's application filed under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed, as well as the order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-04, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CR No. 34/2020, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed and order dated 18.01.2020 upheld. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the learned Magistrate to send the complaint case to the concerned SHO/IO for registration of appropriate FIR, besides a stay of the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate in the aforesaid complaint case.

2. Vide order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top