SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Narendra Babu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner/complainant assailing the order dated 18.01.2020 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CC No. 1866/16, whereby the petitioner's application filed under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed, as well as the order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-04, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CR No. 34/2020, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed and order dated 18.01.2020 upheld. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the learned Magistrate to send the complaint case to the concerned SHO/IO for registration of appropriate FIR, besides a stay of the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate in the aforesaid complaint case.

2. Vide order dated 18.01.2020, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, while dismissing the application of the petitioner filed under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., had taken cognizance of the offence under Section 190 (1)(a) Cr.P.C. and listed the matter for pre-summoning evidence.

3. Brief facts, as borne out from the material place

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top