SANJAY DHAR
Ranjit Kalra – Appellant
Versus
Romala Kapoor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sanjay Dhar, J.) :
1. The petitioners have challenged the complaint filed by the respondent/ complainant against them alleging commission of offences under sections 323, 379, 380, 382, 451 and 506 RPC read with Section 120-B RPC which is stated to be pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu. Challenge has also been thrown to order dated 27.05.2011 passed by the learned CJM whereby the learned Magistrate has, after observing that, prima facie, offences under sections 452, 323, 382, 506 RPC are made out against the petitioners, issued process against them.
2. It appears that the respondent/complainant has filed the impugned complaint before the learned trial Magistrate against the petitioners and co-accused alleging therein that, on 22.05.2009 at around 4.30 pm, the petitioners and co-accused came to the residence of the respondent/complainant and knocked at her door. Upon opening the door, the petitioners forcibly entered into her house along with certain gunda elements and started assaulting and abusing the respondent/complainant. It is further alleged that the respondent/complainant was mercilessly beaten by the petitioners and the co-accused.
Nirmaljit Singh Hoon v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi
A.V. Mohan Rao & Anr. v. M. Kishan Rao & Anr. (2002) 6 SCC 174
(1) If once court of competent jurisdiction did not take cognizance of offences when a complaint was made and said order became final, another complaint on same allegations though filed by complainan....
A Magistrate has discretion to direct a police investigation or proceed with pre-summoning evidence based on the sufficiency of available evidence in a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
Point of law : Whenever a Magistrate decides to refer a complaint to investigation by police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., he does not take cognizance, he awaits the filing of charge sheet and takes ....
Complaint filed by the respondent No.2 would be barred by Section 300 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code being successive prosecution as for the very set of allegations, earlier complaint filed by th....
A magistrate must provide an opportunity to the accused before taking cognizance of an offence, as mandated by Section 223 of BNS-2023, highlighting the limitation on the magistrate's authority in re....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.