Anil Kumar Anand vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Anil Kumar Anand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. conclusion on pending applications and actions (Para 1 , 5 , 7 , 8)
2. appeal against dismissal of interlocutory application (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 46606/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

LPA 493/2021 and CM APPLs. 46604-05/2021

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.10.2021, whereby, inter alia, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the appellant's interlocutory application i.e., CM No. 36637/2021, preferred in W.P.(C) No.965/2020.

2.1. The learned Single Judge has taken the view that interim direction as sought by the appellant [via CM No.36637/2021] could not be issued, at the given stage, as he had fixed the writ petition for hearing on 07.12.2021.

3. The appellant, who appears in-person, says that the writ petition is now listed on 02.02.2022.

3.1. Mr Sanjeev Kumar, who appears on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3 i.e., the contesting respondents, confirms the fact that the matter is fixed before the learned Single Judge on the aforementioned date.

4. Qua the grievance articulated by the appellant that a counter-affidavit has not bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGHAnil Kumar Anand – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Related Judgments