SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Anil Kumar Anand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. interim pension application dismissed. (Para 2)
2. writ petition hearing scheduled. (Para 3)
3. no interference with lower court's order. (Para 4 , 5)
4. applications closed; affidavit required. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 46621/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

LPA 495/2021 and CM APPL. 46619-20/2021

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.10.2021, passed by the learned single judge in CM No. 36626/2021, preferred in W.P.(C) No.950/2020.

2.1. The appellant, who appears in-person, says that the relief sought in the aforementioned application was for payment of interim pension.

2.2. Via the impugned order, the learned single judge has dismissed the appellant's interim application, based on the following rationale:

    "As I have listed the petition for hearing on December 7, 2021, this application seeking interim direction at this stage is impermissible.

    The application is dismissed."

3. We are told that the writ petition is listed for hearing on 02.02.2022, along with five other writ petitions.

4. According to us, no interference is called for with the order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top