SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Satish Kansal – Appellant
Versus
Synergy Tradeco NV – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

IA No.719/2022(for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

IA No.720/2022(u/S. 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015)

3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

IA No.718/2022(u/O.XXXIX R.1&2 CPC)

4. By way of the present application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the plaintiff seeks restraint order against payments to the defendant no.1 of amounts covered under the Letter of Credit (LC) No.027LC01212850007 dated 12th October, 2021 and LC No.027LC01212600008 dated 24th September, 2021, which are due for payments on 17th January, 2022 and 28th January, 2022 respectively.

5. Notice in the said application was issued on 14th January, 2022 and parties were asked to file short submissions. Short submissions have been filed on behalf of the defendant no.2/HDFC Bank.

6. None appears on behalf of the defendant no.1.

7. The case of the plaintiff is that sale orders for certain goods/materials were placed by the plaintiff on 13th September, 2021 and 5th October, 2021 with the defendant no. 1 and Letters of C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top