ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, J. C. DOSHI
Hussain Sheth Ispat – Appellant
Versus
Capital Corp Asia Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.C. DOSHI, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Vishwas K. Shah waives service of notice of rule for the respondent No. 2 and learned advocate Mr. Siddharth Sinha waives service of notice of rule for the respondent No. 3. Though served, none appeared for the respondent No. 1.
2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the judgment and order dated 16.3.2023 passed by the learned Commercial Court (“appellate Court” for short) allowing the Commercial Appeal No. 1 of 2023 filed by the DBS Bank Limited-respondent No. 3, whereby the Learned Appellate Court by vacating injunction has quashed and set aside order below Exh.5 dated 7.5.2022 passed by the learned Commercial Court in Commercial Civil Suit No. 10 of 2021.
2.1 The petitioners are the original plaintiffs, whereas the respondents are the original defendants in the Commercial Civil Suit No. 10 of 2021. For the sake of bravity and convenience, they are referred to as their status before the learned Commercial Court.
FACTS:
3. Tersely stated facts leading to filing of this
Celina Coelho Pereira and Others vs. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and Others
Estralla Rubber vs. Dass Estate (P) Ltd. (2001) 8 SCC 97
Edward and Owen Engineering Ltd. vs. Barclays Sank International Lid. (1978) Q.B. 159
Federal Bank Limited vs. V.M. Jog Engineering and Others
Garment Craft vs. Prakash Chand Goel
Hindustan Construction Co. vs. State of Bihar
ITC Ltd. vs. Debts Record Appellate Tribunal
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund vs. Kartik Das
Mohd. Mehtab Khan vs. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan
Millenium Wires (P) Ltd. vs. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. 2015 (14) SCC 375
Shalini Shyam Shetty and Another vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Standard Chartered Bank vs. Heavy Engineering Corporation
United Commercial Bank vs. Bank of India
The scope and ambit of exercise of power and jurisdiction by a High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is examined and explained in a number of decisions of this Court. The exercise....
Limited grounds for judicial interference in payments under Letters of Credit (LCs) - 'egregious fraud and irretrievable injustice'. Independence of contracts in respect of Bank Guarantees and LCs fr....
Expression “entertain” means to consider by application of mind to the issues raised. The Court entertains a case when it takes a matter up for consideration. The process of consideration could conti....
Enforcement of bank guarantees is upheld unless established fraud or irretrievable injustice is demonstrated; the onus lies with the party seeking injunction to provide clear evidence for equitable r....
Point of Law : Work Contract - Rate of further interest, in the absence of the contractual rate, shall not exceed the rate on which moneys are lent or advanced.
Strict compliance with the terms of a letter of credit is essential for payment; any discrepancies in the documents presented invalidate the entitlement to payment.
Judicial interference in payments under Letters of Credit is only permissible in cases of egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice, with defects in goods representing a breach of contract but not g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a bank guarantee cannot be invoked in the absence of default on the part of the respondent company, and the interim relief is not maintainable....
Responsibilities of banks under ICC Rules include ensuring proper documentation and instructions; fraud vitiates judgments and courts may recall orders obtained through deceit.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.