SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. delay in filing the petition (Para 3)
3. court's analysis on service counting (Para 4 , 5)
4. dismissal of the writ petition (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--This writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 17.05.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in O.A. No.119/2016.

2. Mr S. K. Gupta, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1 i.e., the contesting respondent/original applicant, informs us that partial relief has already been granted to the said respondent i.e., respondent no. 1.

2.1. In this context, Mr Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, has placed before us a copy of the promotion order dated 12.12.2018, whereby respondent no. 1, amongst others, has been accorded the Selection grade [Non-Functional Selection Grade (NFSG)] (Level 13 in the pay matrix) (Pay Band-4 of Rs.37,400-67,000/- + Grade Pay of Rs.8,700/-) (Pre-revised), w.e.f. 01.01.2014.

2.2. Mr Gupta informs us that this promotion order was passed after a contempt petition was instituted.

2.3. Furthermore, he informs us that a second contempt petition has been filed, which is w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top