SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
East Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14585 of 2021 & CM Appl. 45971 of 2021
Decided On : 20-12-2021




The court recognized the petitioner's rights to appeal the assessment to the Municipal Tax Tribunal, ensuring no coercive action occurs during the appeal process.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 123-D and 116-E - Assessment order impugned by the petitioner regarding annual value maintenance from 2020-2021 pending resolution of the Municipal Tax Tribunal case - Coercive action stayed pending appeal - Petitioner required to file appeal and continue property tax payments. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Jurisdiction of Courts - The assessment order was contested due to the inoperability of the Municipal Tax Tribunal; therefore, alternative remedy sought through writ petition. (Paras 2-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an assessment order that maintained the previous rateable value, arguing that the Municipal Tax Tribunal was not functional, leading to the current writ application. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
The court permitted the petitioner to appeal to the Municipal Tax Tribunal once it operates, with protection against coercive actions while appeals remain pending, given compliance with tax obligations. (Paras 7-8)

Issues: The principal issues involved the legality of the assessment and the necessity of appealing to the Municipal Tax Tribunal amidst its operational challenges. (Para 2)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the petitioner to properly escalate the matter to the Municipal Tax Tribunal, reflecting on jurisdictional adherences and provisions for tax assessments. (Paras 5-8)

Result: Petition disposed of with directives for appeal.

Table of Content
1. challenging the assessment order under municipal act (Para 1)
2. pending appeals and their implications on tax reassessment (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. observations on the impugned assessment order (Para 6)
4. directions for filing appeals and interim protection (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

CM APPL. 45972-73/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 14585/2021

1. Petitioner impugns assessment order dated 03.12.2021 whereby the Assessing Authority has invoked the powers under Section 123-D and Section 116-E of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 1957 and maintained the annual value with effect from 2020-2021 subject to the outcome of the case pending with Municipal Tax Tribunal.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent had sought to re-assess the petitioner for the assessment years 01.04.2004 till 31.03.2020. Said assessment was challenged by way of a writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 3667/2020 which petition was disposed of with the direction to the Petitioner to file an appeal before the Municipal Tax Tribunal.

3. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the appeal has been filed and the same is pending and pending the appeal, the Municipal Tax Tribunal by order dated 23.12.2020 noticing that petitioner had deposited the base year's tax demand in terms of the judgment of the High Court in `Springdales School Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.'(2017) 238 DLT 487 (DB), further coercive action was stayed pending the appeal.

4. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the Municipal Tax Tribunal is not functional and as such petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court.

5. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax as per the base year's tax demand has been deposited for these assessment years as well.

6. It is observed that the impugned assessment order, while referring to the earlier proceedings, has maintained the earlier rateable value and stated that the same would be subject to the outcome of the case pending in the Municipal Tax Tribunal.

7. In view of the above, petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Municipal Tax Tribunal within a period of four weeks of the tribunal commencing its functioning.

8. It is directed that subject to petitioner filing the appeal within the time permitted and continuing to deposit the property tax on the basis of self-assessment as well as the property tax as per the base assessment year of 2004, as in the case of earlier years that are pending before the Municipal Tax Tribunal, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till the listing of the appeal before the Municipal Tax Tribunal. It is clarified that the continuance of interim protection thereafter would be subject to the orders to be passed by the Municipal Tax Tribunal.

9. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

10. Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top