SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Madhu Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Neelam Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

I.A. No. 7875/2021 (u/Order VII Rule 11 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter "CPC"] on behalf of Defendant No. 1 seeking rejection of plaint) in CS(OS) 26/2020

1. The above captioned application filed by Defendant No. 1 under Order VII Rule 11 r/w Section 151 of CPC, supported by Defendant No. 2, seeks rejection of the plaint in the present suit, filed by the Plaintiffs seeking, inter-alia, cancellation of the Sale Deed dated 30th August, 2017 executed by the Plaintiffs with respect to basement, ground floor and first floor of property bearing No. AE-90, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi-110088 built up on land measuring 247.50 sq. meters [hereinafter "suit property"].

BRIEF FACTS

2. Before adverting to the grounds urged by the Applicants, it would be apposite to briefly note the narrative as set out, in the plaint as follows:

2.1. Plaintiffs propound that they are joint owners of the suit property. Defendants No. 1 and 2 had approached them through property dealers viz. Defendant No. 3 and Mr. Mukul Lamba along with Mr. Bhupinder Jain and Mr. Sanjay Jain, for purchase of the entire built-up suit pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top