GAURANG KANTH
Sarita Parwanda – Appellant
Versus
Gunjan Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts regarding property transaction (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arguments presented by parties (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 3. court's analysis and application of law (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 4. final conclusion of the court's decision (Para 61) |
JUDGMENT :
Gaurang Kanth, J.
The Appellant in the present Appeal is impugning the judgment dated 05.01.2022 (“Impugned judgment”) in CS DJ No.209865/2016 passed by the Court of Ms. Geetanjali : ADJ-05, South East District, Saket Courts, Delhi titled as ‘Smt. Gunjan Kumar v. Shri Vipin Kumar Parwanda’ Vide the Impugned Judgment, the learned Trial Court was pleased to allow the Suit for Injunction and Possession filed by Respondent No.1.
FACTS GERMANE FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION ARE AS FOLLOWS:
2. It is the case of Respondent No. 1 (Original Plaintiff in the Civil Suit) that the Appellant (Original Defendant No. 2 in the Civil Suit) and Respondent No. 2 (Original Defendant No. 1 i
Karan Madan v. Nageshwar Pandey
Smt. Gangabai v. Smt. Chhabubai
Janak Dulari Devi v. Kapildeo Rai
Gunjan Kumar v. Vipin Parwanda
Mohinder Singh v. Jaswant Kaur (D) Thr. L.rs.
Tara Sikand Atwal v. Viraj Sikand
Nageshwar Pandey v. Karan Madaan
The validity of a registered sale deed is presumed and the burden of proving its invalidity due to fraud lies on the challengers.
(1) Agreement to Sell – Registered Sale Deed carries with it a formidable presumption of validity and genuineness – Registration is not a mere procedural formality but a solemn act that imparts high ....
The court established that a transaction could be classified as a mortgage rather than a sale, emphasizing the burden of proof and admissibility of oral evidence.
The court affirmed that a sale deed executed with authority is valid unless fraud or coercion is proven, and claims must be filed within a statute of limitations.
The burden of proof in a property dispute lies on the person claiming the title, and strict compliance with the provisions of the Registration Act is necessary for the validity of a sale deed and reg....
Fraud must be established by clear evidence; a sale deed executed for valid consideration is valid and cannot be canceled without substantial proof of misrepresentation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.