SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Vandana – Appellant
Versus
HBL Globel Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned Award dated 15th October, 2019 passed by the Labour Court in LC/DID No.408/16 titled Ms. Vandana v. M/s. HBL Globel Pvt. Ltd. By the impugned Award, the Petitioner-Workman (hereinafter `Petitioner') who had challenged the termination of her services was awarded a sum of Rs.1,02,420/-, instead of reinstatement in service with full back wages and continuity of service along with all the consequential benefits, as prayed for in the claim petition.

3. The background of the present petition is that the Petitioner was employed as a Tele-caller on 13th August, 2008 with the Respondent- Management (hereinafter `Management'). Till 2012, she had rendered her services regularly. However, due to medical issues arising out of miscarriage which she is stated to have undergone in June, 2012, she had remained absent from work. This resulted in the Management terminating her services. However, upon filing a complaint with the Labour Commissioner, she was taken back into service. It was the case of the Petitioner that post her terminati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top