Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Paras Fab – Appellant
Versus
Sukh Sagar Silk and Saree – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for payment based on unpaid invoices. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendant's defenses regarding the maintainability and details of the invoices. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of the defenses and the basis for granting leave. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. scope of intervention under article 227 and standard of review. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final order on leave to defend and deposit requirements. (Para 17 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 4619/2022 (exemption for filing certified copies of annexures).
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 87/2022 & CM APPL. 4618/2022 (stay)
1. Issue notice. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-plaintiff. The petition is taken up for hearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner-defendant assails an order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court-02, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS (COMM) 431/2020, whereby the Trial Court has granted leave to defend under Order XXXVII of the
A defendant must establish a substantial or triable issue to gain unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII; conditional leave can be issued if there are serious doubts regarding the genuinene....
Point of Law - Court has considered the issue and confirmed the order passed by the learned trial court granting the application for leave to defend conditionally. All the rights and contentions of t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Trial Court must consider the triable issues raised by the defendant and the documentary evidence on record before granting unconditional ....
The distinction between a disputed claim and an admitted claim in a suit filed under Order XXXVII of CPC and the condition precedent for granting leave to defend based on the admitted amount.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles for granting leave to defend under a summary suit and the entitlement of the defendant to defend the suit base....
The court ruled that leave to defend a summary suit should be granted where defendants raise substantial defenses; however, failure to demonstrate a triable issue leads to dismissal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the defendant for unconditional 'leave to defend' under Order 37 Rule 3 (5) CPC based on the existence of a substantial defense ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
