SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Inderjeet Vachher - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5918 of 2021 & CM. Appls. 18670 of 2021, 19602 of 2021, 22191 of 2021 and 34980 of 2021
Decided On : 31-01-2022




Municipal authorities possess the jurisdiction to enforce laws against unauthorized construction, which must be acted upon as per legal provisions, while respecting the appeals process.

Headnote:(A) Relevant laws include the provisions governing unauthorized construction under local municipal laws.

(B) The essential legal principle is the authority of the Municipal Corporation to act against unauthorized construction.

(C) The court emphasizes the necessity for the Appellate Tribunal to make decisions without influence from this order.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks action against unauthorized construction by others. The Municipal Corporation has taken prior action, including a demolition order.

Findings of Court:
The petition is disposed of, affirming the Corporation's responsibilities to proceed under the law.

Issues: The main issue is whether adequate action has been taken against the unauthorized construction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court rules that the timing and nature of the Corporation's actions justify the dismissal of the petition, while reserving parties’ rights for future appeals.

Result: Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition for action against unauthorized construction (Para 2)
2. status of demolition and appeals before mcd (Para 3 , 4)
3. direction for legal compliance by mcd (Para 5 , 6)
4. final orders and notification (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent/Corporation to take action against the alleged illegal unauthorized construction carried out by respondents No.2 and 3 in property bearing number F-68, Bali Nagar, New Delhi.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation submits that Municipal Corporation has duly taken action and passed a demolition order dated 21.06.2021 and has also rejected the application seeking regularization of the unauthorized construction by order dated 12.08.2021. He further submits that a vacation notice dated 08.09.2021 has also been issued.

4. Learned senior counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 submits that the said respondents have filed appeals against the order of demolition, order of rejection of regularization application and the vacation notice and the said appeals are pending consideration before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.

5. Since the respondent/Corporation has already initiated action, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent/Corporation to take action in accordance with law, subject to the orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal in the three appeals, filed by respondents No.2 and 3.

6. It is clarified that the Appellate Tribunal, MCD shall consider the appeals of respondents No.2 and 3 in accordance with law without being influenced by anything stated in this order.

7. Petition is dispose of in the above terms. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.

8. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through e-mail by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top