JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent/Corporation to take action against the illegal unauthorized construction carried out by respondent No.4 in Flat No.4A, Sandeep Cooperative Group Housing Society, Plot No.35, Rohini, Sector-13, Delhi.

3. Status report has been filed by the Corporation stating that the unauthorized construction has been booked and a demolition order has been passed. However, demolition could not take place as there was non-availability of police force.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submits that not only respondent No.4, but several other flat owners have also made similar additions/alterations in their flats.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 objects to the maintainability of the petition on the ground that the petitioner has adopted a `pick and choose policy'.

6. This is disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the property of the petitioner is right adjoining the property of respondent No.4 and petitioner is directly affected by the illegal construction raised.

7. Learned counsel for respondent N